Writing an Op-Ed with Example

While this was primarily written for my classes, I hope that it might help someone else. THE LENGTH OF YOUR ESSAY MAY DIFFER. FOLLOW DIRECTIONS IN YOUR ASSIGNMENT.

Originally published in newspapers on the page opposite the editorial board’s own opinions, op-eds have since expanded into digital formats and appear in everything from national publications to local blogs. While styles vary, a strong op-ed typically includes:

• A clear, arguable claim – The writer takes a stance on a debatable issue.
• Engaging voice and tone – Op-eds blend professional insight with personal conviction; they may be formal, conversational, passionate, or even humorous depending on the audience.
• Evidence and reasoning – The best op-eds use data, research, lived experience, and logic to back up their arguments.
• Audience awareness – Writers shape their message to resonate with the beliefs, values, and concerns of a specific readership.
• Brevity and clarity – Most op-eds are under 800 words and are written to be clear and accessible, even to non-experts.

In essence, an op-ed is where persuasion meets the public square. It invites dialogue, challenges assumptions, and aims to shape public opinion or policy.

Elements of an Op-Ed (Example)

Before the example, here is some information that was considered for the example:

Topic chosen: What strategies could be most effective in increasing available and affordable housing in a specific city (Nashville, TN).

Audience / publication: The Tennessean (or a local/state newspaper in Tennessee) addressing policymakers, local citizens, developers

Tone: Slightly formal but accessible. The goal was to make the example below persuasive, grounded, and appealing to both hearts and minds

Approximate Length of the Example: about 3 pages equivalent (in op-ed style)

EXAMPLE ESSAY:

Sample Op‑Ed: “Nashville Can’t Build Its Way Out — But Smart Housing Policy Can Help”

For The Tennessean (the chosen publication)

When I moved to Nashville five years ago, I was excited by the city’s energy, the new restaurants, the thriving arts district, and the growing skyline. However, I was struck early on by how hard it was for many people to find a decent place to live: high rents, long commutes, and housing that felt just out of reach for many service workers, teachers, and young families. Nashville is booming, but for many longtime residents, the cost of that boom is displacement and housing instability.

We often hear that the solution is simple: “build more houses.” But anyone who’s driven past a stalled construction site or watched debates over zoning understands that it’s not that simple. As we debate Nashville’s future, we must combine bold development with smarter policy, so that housing is not just plentiful, but affordable, equitable, and sustainable.

Fix the supply, but make it the right supply

Economists increasingly point to housing supply bottlenecks as a primary force pushing prices upward. A recent Brookings report documented how constraints on new construction, especially in densely populated, walkable neighborhoods, have made housing more expensive everywhere (Brookings). Likewise, an Urban Institute analysis argues that “a massive supply shortage is causing high home prices and rents, and the way to fix it is to build more housing (and rehabilitate existing housing where economical) (Urban Institute).”

Adding housing units isn’t enough. We need diversity in the type of housing. In Nashville, much of the recent growth has been luxury condos and high‑end apartments. That helps investors, but doesn’t help the schoolteacher or grocery clerk whose rent is eating up half her paycheck.

One promising tool is inclusionary zoning, where a developer building a project is required (or strongly incentivized) to include a portion of affordable units. That way, growth includes people of many incomes, not just those who can pay top dollar. In Nashville, policymakers could pair this with density bonuses (allowing taller or denser buildings) to keep projects financially viable while adding affordability (Maldon).

Expand rental assistance and preserve what’s already affordable

Even with supply gains in the housing market, many low‑ and moderate-income households will struggle unless policymakers assist more directly. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities notes that “closing the housing affordability gap will require a comprehensive housing strategy, including developing new units, preserving existing affordable housing, and expanding rental assistance (CBPP).”

Nashville’s city government could lobby for expansion of Housing Choice Vouchers and partnerships with non‑profits to convert aging buildings into subsidized housing. At the same time, the city should protect existing naturally affordable housing from being torn down and replaced exclusively with luxury developments.

Recognize housing as a health and equity issue

We tend to think of housing purely in economic terms, but public health scholars remind us that where you live profoundly affects your physical, mental, and social health. A review in Public Health argues that “disparities in access to safe, adequate, and affordable housing contribute to health inequities (PMC).” Families forced to move frequently, double up with others, or live in substandard units face stressors that ripple into schools, medical costs, and community cohesion.

In Nashville, this matters especially in neighborhoods that have historically borne the brunt of racial and economic segregation. If we don’t act intentionally, new housing will further push vulnerable communities to the margins.

Use local voices to guide the policy

This is where you – the citizens of Nashville, TN, community groups, and local leaders matter. A top-down mandate rarely wins trust or long-term success. The best housing policies in cities emerge when they listen to those who live on the margins: renters, neighborhood associations, faith communities, and smaller developers.

I urge Nashville’s mayor and city council to convene participatory planning sessions in East, North, and South Nashville. Ask: What kinds of housing do people need? Where do they want to live? What public investments (parks, transit, schools) would make a new development truly livable?

Why this matters — and now

Seventy-six percent of Americans believe housing affordability is a growing problem, and that sentiment is shared across urban, suburban, and rural communities alike (Center for American Progress). Meanwhile, in 2023, over 31% of U.S. households were considered “housing cost burdened,” which is defined as spending over 30% of income on housing (PRC). In Metro Nashville, median rent and home prices have soared faster than wages, squeezing more people out.

If we don’t act now, we risk becoming a city of two worlds: a gleaming downtown for the affluent, and sprawling suburbs for everyone else. Nashville has the creative spirit, the capital, and the growing demand to lead on inclusive growth. To do so, Nashville needs policies that think beyond “more homes” and into “homes for all.”

Let’s commit to building more and building better!

Works Cited was not included in this example essay. However, students must include them in their essays.